Skip to main content

VIEWPOINT article

Front. Sci., 16 January 2024
This is part of an article hub

New insights and research prospects from the ocean microbiome

  • Department of Earth, Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States

Key points

  • While providing outstanding opportunities for genomic discovery within the ocean microbiome, the KAUST Metagenomic Analysis Platform (KMAP) Global Ocean Gene Catalog 1.0 provides a baseline for the changing microbial communities and activities of the ocean as they react to global warming, ocean acidification, and pollution.
  • Considering the diversity of life in the ocean, the KMAP Global Ocean Gene Catalog 1.0 showcases underexplored marine viruses and fungi with novel roles in organic matter degradation, scavenging, and turnover.
  • Ultimately, the KMAP platform used to assemble and analyze the Global Ocean Gene Catalog 1.0 will prove its worth empirically through researchers, with emerging agendas and new questions, who utilize this resource. Intercalibration and comparability of its taxonomy and functionality pipelines with other genome analysis platforms will be crucial for its wider adoption.

Researchers with a certain amount of experience cannot help noticing the fast turnover of software tools and databases in the bioinformatics landscape. In order to thrive, metagenomic analysis and annotation tools have to remain up to date in terms of content, organization, and taxonomy; they have to be maintained by a devoted team of curators; and they should offer access and handles for a diverse and active user community that prevents them from falling into disuse (1). Finally, long-term institutional support is essential for staying power and longevity in this ever-changing field. The KAUST Metagenomic Analysis Platform (KMAP) appears among the latest entries within the field of large-scale metagenomic analysis and annotation. In their Frontiers in Science article, Laiolo and colleagues deliver an impressive rollout for the KMAP by assembling and analyzing an extensive global marine metagenome dataset, the Global Ocean Gene Catalog 1.0, which represents over 2,000 metagenomic samples predominantly from the open ocean and, to a smaller extent, from coastal waters and benthos (2). Numerous marine metagenomic samples from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA; www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) were extracted as of May 2018 for processing in the KMAP, which includes quality control of readings and assembly of metagenomes (3). The large volume of this marine gene survey imposes some limits on the level of phylogenetic and functional detail that can be accommodated in a paper of reasonable length; therefore, this study emphasizes broad occurrence patterns of microbial classes and phyla, and major metabolic pathways.

When trying to assess potential trajectories of the KMAP, which range from a strictly in-house tool at KAUST to a more widely used metagenomic analysis platform, it certainly helps to look at the results of this global marine survey and to comment on outcomes that will capture the attention of researchers today and tomorrow. First and foremost, this survey provides a benchmark for the global ocean microbiome in the early 21st century, as environmental change—heat uptake and warming of the water column, increased ocean stratification and development of water column anoxia, increased acidification and dissolution of calcareous plankton, and spread of pollution and pathogens—is engulfing the ocean and its microbiome on all fronts (4). This survey captures anaerobic microbial pathways (sulfate reduction, anammox, and nitrate reduction) that are becoming more widespread in response to increasing eutrophication, water column stratification, and suboxic or anoxic conditions in the water column; thus, changing microbial community and pathway profiles act as indicators of global change. Metagenomic samples, which are time-stamped and precisely localized, provide an archive of the ocean microbiome that will extend into the future. While microbial taxonomy and functional annotation in future databases and pipelines will evolve, archived metagenome data provide a baseline against which newly added metagenomes will be compared to record microbial ecosystem change over time. Of course, keeping such efforts on track is not just a challenge for the KMAP but for all metagenomics platforms, and it requires intercomparability and standardization of annotation pipelines.

Metagenomic sequence analysis is perhaps the premier avenue for the discovery of unexpected diversity and new types of microbial life; without metagenomics, the rapid growth of the microbial tree of life would have been unthinkable. While the approximate outlines of the genomic bacterial and archaeal tree of life are becoming visible, this cannot yet be said for the vast domain of parasitic DNA and its viral carriers even after three decades of sequencing environmental genes and genomes. While Bacteria and Archaea get their due, the authors highlight viral diversity as one of the key results of their survey, noting that viral genomes contain far more genetic novelty than previously realized even considering that this DNA-based assessment of the global ocean genome omits RNA viruses. Given their sheer abundance in the ocean, viruses exert key controls on marine biogeochemical cycling (5). “Localized” studies of marine viruses that are associated with specific microbial lineages seek to narrow the field to make it manageable but have instead uncovered swarms of unexplored viral genes that surround their microbial hosts in veritable gene clouds; this is exemplified by two recent studies that limited the hunting grounds to very particular Archaea but found much more than they had bargained for (6, 7). Looking beyond the constraints of a large-scale survey, more detailed functional, structural, and phylogenetic annotation of viral genes and gene products will remain an ongoing challenge.

Another major result that the authors have singled out (and for good reason) is the unexpected prominence of fungi in the mesopelagic water column. The mesopelagic zone is where the sinking biomass of photosynthetic organisms originating in the surface ocean undergoes degradation and remineralization, which is marked by slowing migration and high oxygen demand at the thermocline and pycnocline. Fungal infections of phytoplankton, for example, chytrids colonizing living diatoms, may play a previously underestimated role (8, 9). Diverse lineages of parasitic or free-living marine fungi may emerge as major catalysts of organic matter degradation and turnover. That said, taxonomy annotation pipelines and sequence databases have trouble when it comes to the classification of uncultured or barely cultured fungi. Likewise, this analysis stops at the threshold of pointing out “There be fungi!”. Regardless of these limitations, it is becoming obvious that the contribution of marine fungi to carbon cycling can no longer be ignored, and this study calls attention to this important issue.

The fungal problem touches on a perennial database issue: the rapidly evolving taxonomy of microorganisms. To mention examples from relatively well-cultivated microbial lineages, the class Deltaproteobacteria has morphed into the phyla Deltaproteobacterota, Myxococcota, and Bdellovibrionota (10), and the class Epsilonproteobacteria has become the phylum Campylobacterota (11). Taxonomic turmoil has been particularly severe among uncultured Archaea and Bacteria, where revised class- and phylum-level lineages are proposed based on genomes and metagenomes (12). The resulting taxonomy developed by the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) continues to evolve as new metagenomic branches of life are added (13). The KMAP Global Ocean Gene Catalog 1.0 largely uses the more traditional National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) taxonomy that accommodates historically grown database structure and content (14). Future KMAP maintenance will require that a watchful eye be kept on the rapid development of microbial taxonomy. Finally, regular updates to KMAP will be needed for it to remain current and intercomparable, as outlined by the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles for scientific data management and stewardship (15).

Given the challenges of rapidly evolving microbial taxonomy, the limited number of benthic samples in this water column-focused survey is probably a blessing in disguise since sedimentary habitats are generally anaerobic and harbor a distinct microbial biosphere of mostly uncultured bacterial and archaeal lineages that do not occur in the water column (16). Except for persistently anoxic basins and growing oxygen minimum zones, the water column of the modern ocean is a biosphere dominated by oxygen-respiring life, and it contains the lineages of life that have adapted to the presence of this strong oxidant. Diving into anaerobic waters and sediments, and their ancient microbial inhabitants, could provide an interesting challenge for the KMAP team, and it may serve as a welcome opportunity to keep the spotlight on the KMAP. Finally, intercalibration and comparisons with other metagenomic pipelines, for example, by working on shared datasets or emerging timelines of microbial ocean change at selected locations, should provide further avenues to integrate the KMAP into the global community of metagenomic researchers.

Statements

Author contributions

AT: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Seshadri R, Kravitz SA, Smarr L, Gilna P, Frazier M. Camera: A community resource for metagenomics. PloS Biol (2007) 5(3):e75. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Laiolo E, Alam I, Uludag M, Jamil T, Agusti S, Gojobori T, et al. Metagenomic probing toward an atlas of the taxonomic and metabolic foundations of the global ocean genome. Front Sci (2024) 1:1038696. doi: 10.3389/fsci.2023.1038696

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Alam I, Kamau AA, Ngugi DK, Gojobori T, Duarte CM, Bajic VB. KAUST Metagenomic Analysis Platform (KMAP), enabling access to massive analytics of re-annotated metagenomic data. Sci Rep (2021) 11(1):11511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90799-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Cavicchioli R, Ripple WJ, Timmis KN, Azam F, Bakken LR, Baylis M, et al. Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat Rev Microbiol (2019) 17(9):569–86. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Fuhrman JA. Marine viruses and their biogeochemical and ecological effects. Nature (1999) 399(6736):541–8. doi: 10.1038/21119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Laso-Pérez R, Wu F, Crémière A, Speth DR, Magyar JS, Zhao K, et al. Evolutionary diversification of methanotrophic ANME-1 archaea and their expansive virome. Nat Microbiol (2023) 8(2):231–45. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01297-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Rambo IM, Langwig MV, Leão P, de Anda V, Baker BJ. Genomes of six viruses that infect Asgard archaea from deep-sea sediments. Nat Microbiol (2022) 7(7):953–61. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01150-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Hassett BT, Vonnahme TR, Peng X, Jones EBG, Heuzé C. Global diversity and geography of planktonic marine fungi. Bot Marina (2020) 63(2):121–39. doi: 10.1515/bot-2018-0113

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kilias ES, Junges L, Šupraha L, Leonard G, Metfies K, Richards TA. Chytrid fungi distribution and co-occurrence with diatoms correlate with sea ice melt in the Arctic Ocean. Commun Biol (2020) 3(1):183. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0891-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Waite DW, ChuvoChina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, et al. Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities. Int J Syst Evolut Microbiol (2020) 70:5972–6016. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004213

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Waite DW, Vanwonterghem I, Rinke C, Parks DH, Zhang Y, Takai K, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the class Epsilonproteobacteria and proposed reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.). Front Microbiol (2017) 8:682. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00682

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Parks DH, ChuvoChina M, Chaumeil PA, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Biotechnol (2020) 38(9):1079–86. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0501-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Parks DH, ChuvoChina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil PA, Hugenholtz P. GTDB: An ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res (2022) 50(D1):D785–94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab776

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Schoch CL, Ciufo S, Domrachev M, Hotton CL, Kannan S, Khovanskaya R, et al. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database (Oxford) (2020) 2020:baaa062. doi: 10.1093/database/baaa062

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data (2016) 3:160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Baker BJ, Appler KE, Gong X. New microbial biodiversity in marine sediments. Annu Rev Mar Sci (2021) 13:161–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-032020-014552

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: shotgun metagenomics, microbes, ocean gene catalog, biodiversity, ocean domains, functional genomics, biogeochemical cycling

Citation: Teske A. New insights and research prospects from the ocean microbiome. Front Sci (2024) 1:1351968. doi: 10.3389/fsci.2023.1351968

Received: 07 December 2023; Accepted: 28 December 2023;
Published: 16 January 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Angel Borja, Marine Research Division, Spain

Copyright © 2024 Teske. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Andreas Teske, teske@email.unc.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.